A client has skin (Buck's) traction due to a fall early in the evening and has a hip fracture. He asks why he has this. Which is the nurse's BEST response given his situation?
Explanation & Rationale
Choice A reason: Buck's traction is a form of temporary skin traction rather than a permanent method for bone reduction or realignment. While it provides some stabilization, its primary mechanical purpose is not the definitive reduction of the fracture, which typically requires surgical intervention such as internal fixation for hip fractures. Choice B reason: While Williams traction or pelvic traction is sometimes utilized to alleviate pressure in the lumbar region for clients experiencing low back pain, Buck's traction is specifically indicated for lower extremity fractures. It does not target the physiological mechanisms or structural misalignments associated with chronic or acute low back pain. Choice C reason: This is the scientifically correct response because hip fractures often trigger intense, involuntary muscle contractions or spasms around the injury site. Buck's traction applies a longitudinal pulling force that overcomes these muscle spasms, reducing pain and preventing further displacement of the bone fragments until definitive surgical repair. Choice D reason: Buck's traction actually carries a risk of skin breakdown rather than preventing it. Because the traction involves applying adhesive or non-adhesive straps directly to the skin, nursing priority must include monitoring for pressure ulcers or shearing. It is not designed to protect the integumentary system from injury.