A nurse is assisting in the care of a child. Which of the following provider prescriptions is anticipated, nonessential, or contraindicated for the child? For each potential provider’s prescription, click to specify if the potential prescription is anticipated, nonessential, or contraindicated for the child. There must be at least 1 selection in every row. There does not need to b e a selection in every column.
Explanation & Rationale
The management of an esophageal foreign body in a pediatric client following fish ingestion in a child presenting with choking symptoms, stridor, vomiting, and radiographic confirmation of an object lodged in the esophagus with surrounding swelling. Esophageal foreign bodies pose risks of airway compromise, mucosal injury, perforation, and aspiration. Priority care involves airway monitoring and prompt removal via endoscopy, while avoiding interventions that could worsen obstruction or injury. Rationale: • Monitor the child’s respiratory status frequently: Esophageal foreign bodies can rapidly compromise the airway due to swelling, displacement, or aspiration. The presence of stridor and wheezing indicates partial airway obstruction or irritation. Continuous respiratory monitoring is essential to detect worsening obstruction or respiratory distress early. • Prepare the child for an endoscopic exam: Endoscopy is the standard and definitive method for removing esophageal foreign bodies. It allows direct visualization and safe retrieval of the object while minimizing further injury. Given radiographic confirmation and symptoms, this is an urgent and expected intervention. Prompt preparation helps prevent complications such as perforation or airway compromise. • Examine each stool the child passes: Stool monitoring may be useful after confirmed passage of a swallowed object, but it is not appropriate in this case because imaging has already confirmed the object is lodged in the esophagus. The object is unlikely to pass spontaneously due to its size and location. Therefore, monitoring stool does not contribute to immediate management. Endoscopic removal is the priority. • Encourage the child to consume soft foods: Encouraging oral intake when a foreign body is lodged in the esophagus increases the risk of complete obstruction, aspiration, or further impaction. Swallowing food could worsen swelling or push the object deeper into the esophagus. The child is already showing signs of airway irritation and vomiting, making oral intake unsafe. Therefore, this intervention is contraindicated. • Place nasogastric tube to low-intermittent suction: Insertion of a nasogastric tube is contraindicated because it may dislodge the foreign body, cause perforation, or worsen esophageal injury. The object is already causing swelling and partial obstruction, increasing the risk of trauma. Blind passage of a tube could also push the object into the airway or cause complete blockage. Therefore, this intervention is unsafe and should be avoided.