For which of the following patients would a comprehensive health history be appropriate?

A. An established patient presenting with a sprained ankle is having a problem-focused visit. The assessment is limited to the specific acute issue, including the mechanism of injury, pain level, swelling, and range of motion. A comprehensive health history is unnecessary because the patient’s general health and chronic conditions are already documented. B. An established patient with a cold also requires a focused or episodic history, targeting symptom onset, severity, associated symptoms, and risk factors for complications. A full comprehensive history would be redundant since the provider already has the patient’s baseline medical information. C. A new patient presenting to establish care is correct because a comprehensive health history is indicated for new patients. This involves collecting detailed information about medical history, surgical history, medications, allergies, family history, social habits, and a complete review of systems. It establishes a baseline for future care, preventive screening, and chronic disease management. The comprehensive assessment also allows the provider to identify risk factors or previously unrecognized health conditions. D. An established patient with a cut hand is also seen for a problem-focused visit. The assessment targets the injury itself, such as depth, bleeding, infection risk, and functional status. A full comprehensive history is not required in this context.