The nurse is assigned to care for several clients admitted to a telemetry unit. Which client should the nurse assess first?
Explanation & Rationale
Choice A rationale This client is the highest priority due to significant cardiovascular instability evidenced by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator firing twice. This indicates the client experienced life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, within the last shift. The administration of amiodarone, a Class III antiarrhythmic, further highlights the severity of the irritability in the ventricular myocardium. The nurse must assess for continued arrhythmias, electrolyte imbalances like potassium 3.5 to 5.0 mEq/L, and signs of decreased cardiac output. Choice B rationale New onset atrial fibrillation requires medical management to control the ventricular rate and prevent thromboembolism, but it is generally less immediately life-threatening than recurring ventricular arrhythmias. Scheduled IV diltiazem is a calcium channel blocker used for rate control. While the client needs assessment for hemodynamic stability and a heart rate usually kept below 100 beats per minute, they do not take precedence over a client whose heart recently required internal shocks to maintain a rhythm. Choice C rationale A client who is 2 hours post-electrophysiology procedure reporting constipation is the lowest priority. While post-procedure assessments are important to check the insertion site for hematoma or hemorrhage and peripheral pulses, a complaint of constipation is a non-urgent gastrointestinal issue. It does not indicate a compromise in the ABCs (Airway, Breathing, Circulation) or a complication of the cardiac procedure itself. This can be addressed after the unstable cardiac clients have been thoroughly assessed and stabilized. Choice D rationale Elective cardioversion is a controlled procedure used to restore a normal sinus rhythm. A heart rate of 115 beats per minute 1 hour post-procedure indicates tachycardia, which may mean the procedure was unsuccessful or that the client is experiencing anxiety or pain. While this requires follow-up assessment and potentially further intervention, the client is currently more stable than the client in Choice A, whose device had to fire autonomously to prevent sudden cardiac death from a ventricular rhythm.