Which of the following would indicate a duty to warn a third party?

A. A client with delusions states, "I'm going to get them before they get to me" This statement is concerning because it suggests a potential threat. However, it is vague and does not specify a particular individual or group. While it warrants further assessment and monitoring, it may not immediately trigger a duty to warn a specific third party without more information. B. A client says he plans to blow up the government. This statement indicates a threat to a broad and non-specific target (the government). While it is serious and requires intervention, it does not fall under the typical duty to warn a specific third party. Instead, it would likely involve notifying authorities to prevent potential harm. C. A client states "If I can't have my girlfriend back, then no one can have her." This statement is a direct threat to a specific individual (the girlfriend), indicating potential harm. In such cases, the nurse has a duty to warn the third party and take appropriate steps to ensure their safety. D. A hostile client says "I hate all police" While this statement indicates hostility, it does not specify a direct threat of harm or action, so it may not necessarily indicate an immediate duty to warn.